1) [ Davide e Golia ] La sproporzione di mezzi tra un pezzo di palestinesi (esecrabile ma comprensibile nella sua rabbia che dura da cinquant'anni senza sbocchi) e gli israeliani non rende possibile equipare le violenze degli uni e degli altri. Bisogna sempre prender parte. In questo caso quella del più debole, del più clamorosamente debole... Ripenso a Munich "di Spilberg (ebreo), ripenso ad alcune frasi di George Steiner (ebreo), e so che è giusto, ora come non mai, difendere i palestinesi (malgrado their ruling classes) and to insist on a international intervention and the creation of an army that can intervene between them and an Israel increasingly blinded by his dream impossible to remove the opponent.
2) [ filoterrorismo Neither antisemitism nor ] Defending the Palestinians from what begins to resemble more and more like a genocide does not mean supporting the terrorists, be against the policies of the State of Israel does not mean being anti-Semitic. I'm sorry to have to repeat every time. But now I'm used to. Paradoxical one that considers the fundamental Jewish thought and culture in their training.
3) [ the wrong ] Really on the Palestinian issue the media are handled, otherwise it would be clear that it is an indiscriminate massacre. It 's like the war in Iraq. The servants of the rulers at that time were any justification, Hussein (ruthless tyrant, no doubt, even with U.S. aid in the war against Iran) compared to Hitler. And we say that there were other means, that there were no weapons of mass destruction. Bella consolation to know, about a million deaths later, it is true that the CIA "gave us inaccurate information." Do not ever be afraid to be, as Brecht said, in the wrong.
0 comments:
Post a Comment